Educational policy, curriculum development, and
instructional practices – all of these revolve around a central question –
“what kind of a citizen does the education system aims at developing?” If the
policymakers can answer this convincingly, then half of the battle is won. The
response to this question provides the direction in which a state/country wants
to proceed. Once the direction is clear, all that remains is the alignment of
educational policies, curriculum, and instructional practices in the desired
direction.
Traditionally, the educational policymakers have
focused on citizenship values within national framework (as suggested in
various national education commission, NCERT and MHRD reports). However, this
definition needs a revision because the present India is deeply connected with
the international community.
•
Economic
Argument: In 1991, India
began major economic reforms and since then its economy has been gradually
opening up. In his book ‘Breakout Nations’ , Ruchir Sharma reports that for
more than past three decades India’s GDP growth-rate is highly correlated
(>.9) with the average GDP growth-rate across emerging markets.
Multinational corporations have entered many sectors and the Indian companies,
too, are going global. In short, the Indian economy is greatly affected by the
global economy. The economic projections can no longer be based on domestic
factors alone; and our youth have to have some understanding of how the world
economy works.
•
Cultural
Argument: Due to the
revolutionary expansion of telecommunication and internet, the youth is exposed
to cultures of various parts of the world like never before. From the world
cinema, literature and television to sports and fashion – today’s youth is
consuming and sharing everything that is easily accessible to them. Societal
norms (e.g., linguistic, clothing & fashion, behavioural and thinking
pattern) are being redefined at a fast pace. For an example, let’s look at the
cultural value of obedience. In traditional Indian society, an ideal student
would be the one who is obedient and follows everything that the teacher says.
However, today the students have a lot many sources of accessing
learning-content. Therefore, in the case of discrepancy between teacher’s
instruction and students’ prior knowledge, the students may no longer accept
everything that the teacher says. They might question – question teacher’s
source of information and even his/her understanding. Though the educators and
policy-makers like to say that they encourage inquiry-driven approach to
learning, the conflict between questioning and obedience is often explicit in
the Indian classrooms. We have to look at India’s cultural-values, given their
dynamism, in the global perspective.
• Environmental Argument: A lot has been said about global climate change and environmental hazards by so many experts. It is a high time we inculcate values in our children for taking the responsibility of environment in and beyond India.
• Environmental Argument: A lot has been said about global climate change and environmental hazards by so many experts. It is a high time we inculcate values in our children for taking the responsibility of environment in and beyond India.
•
Security
Argument: Since
independence, India has been dealing with external security threats. After 9/11
attacks in New York, the global security concerns have been reported widely.
The terrorists and anti-India organizations often have strong interlinks that
transcend various parts of the world. Note that late-adolescence is the
developmental stage when the youngsters are deeply concerned about national
security and tackling threats and need all the answers. Our education system
needs to deal with these issues to help youth understand that things are not as
simple as bombing or invading a country. This may also help youth deal with
extremism, hate-propaganda and war-mongering.
•
Resource
Constraint Argument:
With increasing world population and decreasing available resources, future
citizens may find it more challenging to coexist peacefully. We already feel
the tension with neighbours for water. In future, need for energy, raw material
for industries and water-scarcity may trigger bigger conflicts. The education
system has to equip younger minds with international understanding and skills
for conflict resolution.
Considering these arguments, let’s rethink – what
kind of future citizens do we need? Based on my understanding of today’s
knowledge-based economy and modern educational research on required knowledge
and skills for the 21st century, I would suggest the following characteristics
that we may like to see in a citizen:
1.
Understands
how the world functions economically, politically, technologically and
environmentally (as suggested by Oxfam, UK).
2.
Is
globally competent in respective field of study
3.
Is
able to identify and define problems, gather evidences, and produce knowledge.
a.
Is
capable of implementing knowledge based solutions to the real world for
sustainable development
4.
Is
able to develop and maintain successful relationship based on mutual respect
and acceptance with people of different religions, nationality, racial and
linguistic backgrounds, and cultures.
5.
Identifies
personal interest with the collective interest of human society.
6.
Critically
analyses and understands the difference between hate-propaganda, war mongering
and systematic injustice.
7.
Thinks
globally, analyses nationally and acts locally (based on Lynn Davis’ work on
global citizenship).
Implications for
Curriculum
When
we define global citizenship as described above the aim of the curriculum
changes in parts, if not completely. Though science and mathematics remain
important, subjects like languages, commerce and social sciences gain high
value as well. Curricula for math and science become inquiry-based, where
students have to identify and define problems, form hypothesis, design
experiments, collect and analyse data, infer results, and design improvement
plans. The focus is more on the depth of learning, rather than its broadness.
Just as reading and writing, computer programming languages and coding also
become part of students’ required skill-set right from primary schools.
As
described in the previous article, the history and geography education needs to
a different approach (based on John Dewey’s recommendations). The objective for
‘history’ should not be to glorify certain kings and describing wars, but to
understand how wars are devastating for societies and why (and how) that should
be avoided. History curriculum should put higher emphasis on the lives and
struggles of ordinary people of respective times, the challenges that they
faced and the solutions they obtained. Similarly, the subject of geography
needs to aim at conveying how geographical factors affect human lives, culture,
economic investments, developmental plans of governments and respective
environmental issues; and how the interlink of all factors in other regions are
different from (and similar to) learner’s geographic region.
Nurturing
critical minds is no small objective. The aim of teaching languages must be
beyond achieving literacy. Audio-visual contents, especially movies and plays
deserve a place in language curriculum. What and how much students are supposed
to read and write must have strong justifications. In addition to the local
literature, there has to be some incorporation of great works from different
parts of the world. Also, a course on creative writing needs to be integrated
in the formal curriculum. Poetry writing, play writing, script writing, movie
making, literary critiquing are all ignored aspects of linguistic competency in
the present curriculum across various educational boards in India – why?
Finally,
in order to enhance students’ understanding of how the world functions, the
high school curriculum needs to be flexible. Students should be allowed to take
interdisciplinary courses. For example, a science student maybe interested in
entrepreneurship, so why shouldn’t s/he be allowed to take a business course?
Or a psychology student maybe interested in taking higher math course to learn
matrix algebra which is essential for factor analysis of psychological
constructs. In today’s competitive globalized world, we must give our students
maximum learning opportunities. Rigid educational structure is not helping us
achieve that.
Implication for
Instructional Practices
As suggested by Davis (2008), schools can encourage
students to think globally, analyse nationally and act locally on various vital
issues. A typical classroom will use elements of critical pedagogy where
students are active participants in the classroom discussions and the teacher’s
role is that of a facilitator. Teacher guides students’ inquiry rather than
preaching personal opinions.
For example, a lesson on immigration issue can
proceed in the following direction in a school in the city of Ahmedabad,
Gujarat:
•
Global
thinking: Are there
accounts of Indians being discriminated abroad? (Explore cases of Indian
students ill-treated in Australia/UK; labourers exploited in the Middle East
and so on). Why is that happening? What do the native people think of Indian community?
•
National
analysis: How does India
treat immigrants? Explore the conflict between Bangladeshi immigrants and
Bengali/Assamese people. What is the problem in Mumbai with internal migration?
What is the conflict between Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and North Indian
community in Mumbai? What are the factors forcing people to migrate? What is
the central government doing to ensure a balanced growth of India?
•
Local
action: How is
Ahmedabad/Gujarat dealing with international/national immigrants? How will it
tackle immigration in future (as rapid development may attract
skilled/unskilled people from everywhere)? Students plan activities to
facilitate immigrants – e.g., meeting immigrant communities, inviting guests,
visiting places where they encounter foreigners, making friends via internet
and exposure to other cultures-food-music-dances- movies.
Note that the class discussions could be political
in-nature. Therefore, it is imperative that the adolescents and youth are
exposed to all sides of viewpoints while discussing a particular issue. The
multiple perspectives from multiple sources may help them develop deeper
understanding of the complex reality. For example, while discussing the Kashmir
issue, one should look into the Indian government’s stand, the Pakistan
government’s stand, the United Nations resolution as well as the viewpoints of
various Kashmiri communities (people in valley, Jammu, Ladakh, and
Gilgit-Baltistan).
In
order to have effective instructional practices, a democratic teacher-student
relationship is highly warranted.
According to Paulo Freire (quoted in Bartlett, 2008), “…dialogue cannot
occur between those who want to name the world and those who do not wish this
naming – between those who deny other men the right to speak their word and
those whose right to speak has been denied to them”. Teacher has to create an
environment for a dialogue, and establish a horizontal relationship with the
students. Furthermore, teachers themselves need to demonstrate global
citizenship values. It has been well established in the educational literature
that teachers can teach a lot via modelling desired behaviour and skills (as
per Vygotsky’s developmental theory).
The
incorporation of the global citizenship, as defined in this article, in the
formal education has a potential for nurturing independent critical minds that
are capable of working collaboratively for the sustainable development, and
producing (and utilizing) knowledge which can help resolve difficult issues.
The goal is too idealistic; but we need to begin from somewhere, don’t we?
References
Bartlett, L.
(2008). Paulo Freire and Peace Education. In Bajaj M. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of
peace education (39-45). North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Davis, L.
(2008). Global citizenship education. In Bajaj M. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of peace
education (109-114). North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment