[NOTE: A version of this article was published in Fair Observer magazine on 19th April 2013.]
India’s school system has witnessed a huge expansion since 1950 when the country
began
to
develop a mass education system, which was earlier elite oriented during the times of British
colonial rulers. The basic education system, which consisted of around
200,000 schools in 1950,
has expanded to more than 1.1 million in 2010.
The growth has been particularly impressive since 1990. During this period, enrolment
increased from mere 22.3 million (Govinda, & Josephine, 2004) to more than 193 million in 2010-11 (Mehta, 2012). According to an estimate – “95% of the rural population has a primary
school within 1 km and about 85% population have an upper primary
school within 3 km” (Govinda &
Josephine, 2004).
Though the enrolment rates are close to universal in the current scenario, the
quality of education is a big concern. Education Initiatives (2010) conducted a large scale study across 18 Indian states (N=160000). Students of class 4, 6 and 8 were sampled from 2399 government
schools and were tested in language and mathematics through common-test papers in 13 language versions.
In their executive summary, researchers reported
–“learning
levels are
extremely
low”. Many other large studies on nationally representative sample have suggested
similar conclusions (for e.g., ASER 2005-12; and
NCERT, 2008). Such results point out at the
fact
that
Indian policy makers have failed to look beyond the enrolment-rates and the literacy-rate, which stands at just above 74% as per India Census 2011. Fortunately, there is some recognition of this poor quality of education among the policymakers and politicians. In
his
address to the teachers and educators on the Teacher’s Day, the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh said (News track India, 2012) –
“… as we move ahead, we need a
clear shift in
our strategy from a focus on inputs, access and enrolment to what goes on in the classroom
and the school.
We need to set up transparent and reliable systems for tracking attendance of children in a truly meaningful way.
At the same
time, we
need
to put
in place
a
system of
continuous
assessment of the benefit our children
are getting from their education. Participation
of the community and parents would be essential in this process, so that they
can be satisfied with the quality of
teaching."
Though there is a lot of rhetoric on “all round development of children” in policy discussions, Indian policymakers have remained
reluctant in expanding their definition
of schooling (i.e., enrolment and literacy rates as described above). Even today, the mass-education system gives hardly any
encouragement to inquiry and higher order learning; classroom participation and discussions; sports, music and other art
forms.
Furthermore, there has been little attention paid to the children with special needs. Overall, most educational boards
across Indian states define disability as blindness, hearing and/or speech
impairment,
mental retardation and physical
disability.
There is no consideration of the entire gamut of psychological conditions in children (for e.g., learning-disability, emotional disturbance, autism spectrum, schizophrenia, anxiety
and depressive symptoms etc.). As a result, concept of school
psychology and access to psychological services have mostly
remained absent from the educational policies and India’s educational
infrastructure.
Higher Education
Like basic school education, the
higher education system has undergone a rapid expansion
in
past six decades. When India got Independence,
there were only 20 universities and 496 colleges across the nation (UGC, 2008). But, as of 2012, there are nearly 621 universities and 27468 colleges in India (MHRD,
2012). However, the access to higher education has a very narrow
base, as only 12.4 % of students (MHRD, 2011) go for it as compared to nearly 18% in China
(Young, 2012)
and 41% in the US (The Washington Post, 2011).
In order to increase that
figure of 12.4% to 30%, India would require another 800 - 1000 universities and over 40,000 colleges by the next decade (Gupta &
Gupta, 2012). It is worth mentioning that the
vocational education
track is extremely underdeveloped in India, unlike Germany or Finland. According to the Ministry of Human Resource Development
report, only about 5% of students opt
for vocational
education route.
In addition to the problem of access,
there is a deep crisis of the quality of higher education. Let
alone the mass higher education institutions, a few of the “premier” institutions (e.g., IIMs & IITs) that the policymakers usually boast of rarely ever appear on the list of world’s top five
hundred institutions. Agarwal
(2006) summarizes this crisis aptly in his abstract as follows:
“The standards of academic research are
low
and declining. Some
of the problems of the
Indian higher education, such as – the unwieldy affiliating system, inflexible academic structure,
uneven capacity across various subjects, eroding autonomy of academic
institutions, and the low
level of public funding are well known.
Many other concerns relating to the dysfunctional regulatory environment, the accreditation system that has low coverage and no consequences,
absence of incentives for performing well, and the unjust public funding policies are not well recognised. Driven by populism and in the absence of good data,
there is little informed public debate on higher education in India” (p.g. IV).
India, having a median age of 27years, is a nation of young people. It has 672 million
people in the age-group 15 to 59 years, which is often considered the “working age population”. It is also being predicted that the dependency ratio (i.e., proportion of non-working population to total
population) will be on a decline over the next 30 years, which will constitute a major opportunity of ‘demographic dividend’ for
India.
On the other hand, most of the developed countries are growing old and are likely to
face
increasing economic crunch as their dependency ratio is on the rise. If India can develop a skilled
workforce through dramatic expansion of vocational and higher education
system quantitatively as well as qualitatively, she will not just serve her self-interest but the interest of many other parts of
the
world. Whether India suffers “demographic disaster” with millions unskilled and unemployed or
achieves “demographic
dividend” by generating skilled human resource that take her to prosperity,
only the time will tell that. Without a doubt, Indian educational policy makers have one of the toughest
jobs of
the
21st century.
References
Agarwal, P. (2006). Higher education in India: The need for change. Indian Council for Research on International
Economic Relations; Retrieved from: http://www.icrier.org/pdf/icrier_wp180__higher_education_in_india_.pdf
ASER Centre (2005-12). Main Findings ASER 2005-11. New Delhi, India. Retrieved from: http://www.asercentre.org/ngo-education-india.php?p=ASER+KEY+DOCUMENTS
ASER Centre (2005-12). Main Findings ASER 2005-11. New Delhi, India. Retrieved from: http://www.asercentre.org/ngo-education-india.php?p=ASER+KEY+DOCUMENTS
Education
Initiatives. (2009).
Student learning
study: An
India
report. Retrieved from: http://www.ei-india.com/student-learning-study-an-india-report/
Govinda, R, and Y Josephine. (2004). Para-Teachers in India: A Review, National Institute of Educational
Planning and Administration,
New
Delhi.
Gupta, D. and Gupta, N. (2012). Higher Education in India: Structure, Statistics and Challenges. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(2), 17-24.
Mehta, Arun C. (2012). Elementary Education in India: Progress towards UEE: Analytical Report 2010-11.NUEPA, New Delhi. Retrieved from
(11/12/2012): http://www.dise.in/Downloads/Publications/Publications%202010-11/AR%202010-11/DISE-analytical-tables-provisional-2010-11.pdf
MHRD. (2012). Provisional report on All India Survey on Higher
Education 2010-11. New Delhi. Retrieved from:
http://mhrd.gov.in/statistics_data?tid_2=239
MHRD. (2011). Annual Report on Higher Education in India- 2009-2010. New Delhi. Retrieved
from: http://mhrd.gov.in/statistics_data?tid_2=158
NCERT. (2008). Learning Achievement of Students at the end of Class V: Executive Summary. Sarva
Shiksha Abhiyan. Retrieved
from:
http://ssa.nic.in/quality-of-education/learning- achievement-of-students-at-the-end-of-class-v
News track India. (2012). PM Manmohan Singh emphasizes on need to improve education quality. Retrieved from: http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2012/9/4/285-PM-Manmohan- Singh-emphasizes-on-need-to-improve-education-quality.html
The Washington Post. (2011). Playing Catch Up with the College. Retrieved from:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/playing-catch-up-in-college-
completion/2011/09/12/gIQAegt6NK_graphic.html
UGC. (2008). Higher Education in India: Issues related to expansion, inclusiveness,
quality and finance. New Delhi.
Young, E. (2012).
Global
education
shifts. Inside
Higher Ed. Retrieved
from: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/07/12/china-and-india-producing-larger-share-
global-college-graduates
An interesting article Kathan
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Hardik Patel.
An interesting article Kathan
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Hardik Patel.
Thanks a lot, Hardik. Keep reading and sharing :)
Delete