Saturday, October 6, 2012

The Global Beings: Binding the Humanity

Human societies have always encountered divisions based on religion, caste, race, gender, colour, economic class, nationality, and language and so on. Whenever I come across contents of hate-speeches, abuses, violent events, and wars, some difficult questions resurface and drag me into never ending internal struggle – stuck with thoughts meeting dead ends. I often wonder – given all divisive forces that are so prevalent in human societies, why don’t we, the human beings, fight all the time? If all of us have so much of hatred for one another, why don’t we just call for all-out war and finish each other off? Why do we sustain?

If we go deeper into the question – “why conflict exists”, it is apparent that there are at least two perspectives on any topic of interest. When we are unable to find a common element which holds both perspectives together, the conflict arises. In other words, conflict is born out of incompatibility of different perspectives. Let’s see a very simplistic example: a wife wants to watch a romantic movie with her husband, whereas the husband wants to watch sports on TV. Both options are not feasible, and the conflict has generated. The question remains how the couple responds to the incompatibility – who holds on to the personal desire and who accommodates the other person’s choice. 

Conflicts are inevitable. It is just impossible for us to have compatible perspectives all the time with everyone. Therefore, whether we spend energy fighting with each other or collaborate for taking the mankind forward depends on how we respond to the conflicts. The zone in which we respond with kindness and consideration, I shall call it “conflict-free” zone. Different people have different areas of conflict-free zones. The figure (below) shows possible categories of conflict-free zones. As we move in upward direction from “I” to “Global Being”, the area of conflict-free zone widens. 

            People in “Myself” category are ready to pick up fights with all others who have incompatible perspective with their own. They are unwilling to identify any common grounds between themselves and others. They can be highly self-centred and egoist.
At level two, lies people concerned only for their family. These people are willing for resolving all conflicts within their “family” peacefully; but can neither forget nor forgive anyone outside of it. A conflict with a non-family member results into never ending battle for this category people.
On similar lines, “My Caste/ State/ Language/ Gender/ Religion/ Nation” people proactively lookout for conflict resolution within those respective boundaries. They invest all their resources not only for resolving conflicts within zone-people, but for fighting against the “other sides”.  

People in all the categories so far dichotomize the human population in – “I” & “You, or “We” & “Them”. The focus is almost always on –“We are not like them; and they are not like us”. The “others” are always demonized and considered as the existential threat. The aggressive response to the conflict is often justified by “victim” mentality. People rationalize their prejudices that lead to aggressive reaction saying –“We are victims of their deeds. We were better off in the past; and they tarnished us. Whatever we are suffering is because of them” – and so on.  Once this is understood, it is not difficult to understand the genesis of hate-speeches, abuses, violent events, and wars that we see in the world today.

The biggest challenge for the mankind is then revealed –“Can a human being rise above these dichotomies of ‘we’ and ‘them’?” So far, a very few have taken up this challenge in the history of mankind. Though small in number, these people have had the biggest impact on the human societies. An individual who takes up this challenge is called “The Global Being”. Instead of getting trapped into the cycles of revenge and violence, these people work towards conflict resolutions by identifying compatible long-term interests.  They recognize the binding forces and succeed in transcending all divides.  They realize the higher dimension of life that links them to all fellow human-beings; and feel for them, share their suffering, pain, joy, and love. As long as these “Global Beings” exist, the human society will sustain. The peace and harmony will triumph over war and hatred.
So next time when you face a conflict outside your “conflict-free zone”, here’s the challenge – Can you rise beyond that zone?  

Monday, August 27, 2012

Global Peace: A Delusion at Present

Have you ever wondered why we human beings have not been able to achieve global peace? Our technological advancement has been terrific, but why have we not learnt to co-exist peacefully? Why some or the other region in the world has to be a “conflict zone”? 

 Courtesy:  http://www.oxfam.org/en/content/2012-g8-summit-camp-david-maryland
The answer is simple: Peace does not help generate money for the ruling class. 

Leaders of countries with “conflict zone” are short sighted, corrupt, self-indulgent, incompetent or all of that and continue ‘kicking the can down the road’, neglecting steps for the real solutions. This is the scenario in most of the developing countries with conflicts.

Whereas, leaders in “conflict-free” countries need conflict in other countries to drive their economy. Check the list of ‘Top Arms Exporters’ (Ref: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2012. http://www.sipri.org/googlemaps/2012_of_at_top_20_exp_map.html):

1. USA
2. Russia
3. Germany
4. France
5. United Kingdom
6. China
7. Spain
8. Netherlands
9. Italy
10. Israel

If there is peace in the world, who will buy the arms? The list is full of “developed nations” (except China, Russia which fall in developing category). All these nations often look out for excuses to intervene in other countries’ conflicts. In the name of “peace”, “democracy” and “freedom”, they often generate more complexities by providing arms to rival groups, fueling the conflicts; for example: almost all wars around the world after IInd World War. Interestingly, all five permanent members of UN Security Council are topping this list of the arms sellers.

No wonder, global peace is a delusion in the present world order.

See this interactive world map of conflict zones:
Slide the arrow to see how number of conflicts has increased in recent times.

Saturday, June 2, 2012

India: A Country of Cheap Public-Gossips


There is nothing called public discourse in India; what exists is public-gossips. I may sound cynical, but I am simply frustrated by the complete silence in media/public forums on the issues that matter to the people– issues that are related to the development of people and their quality of life – how India is generating resources and preparing itself for the present and future challenges – what systematic reforms are required and carried out in order to establish transparency and accountability at each level of governance. The Planning Commission of India lists “Twelve Strategy Challenges” for the 12th five year plan (2012-17):

1. Enhancing the Capacity for Growth
2. Enhancing Skills and Faster Generation of Employment
3. Managing the Environment
4. Markets for Efficiency and Inclusion
5. Decentralisation, Empowerment and Information
6. Technology and Innovation
7. Securing the Energy Future for India
8. Accelerated Development of Transport Infrastructure
9. Rural Transformation and Sustained Growth of Agriculture
10. Managing Urbanization
11. Improved Access to Quality Education
12. Better Preventive and Curative Health Care
More details about this list can be obtained here: http://12thplan.gov.in/displayforum_list.php

My cynicism stems from the following experiment:
On any day go to any of these Indian Media (print/TV) sites
       o NDTV
       o CNN-IBN
       o Aaj Tak
       o India TV
       o Hindustan Times
       o The Times of India
       o DNA
       o The Indian Express
Count stories/articles/videos which are relevant to India’s strategic-challenges in12th plan as mentioned above.

I have attempted this experiment and have had results varying between 2%-20%. And when I counted articles/reports based on any research studies, there was none. You can do the same experiment. There are hundreds of news-papers/channels, so pick up the one that interests you the most and start counting. I am sure your result will not be more different than that of mine.

It is a disheartening fact that the media is completely indulged in the cheap gossips of personalities of four areas – cricket, cinema, corporate, & politics. There is just not enough constructive discussion on issues that matter to you and me.

Nonetheless, I think media is in-a-way reflection of the society. Media’s dumbness points out that the masses are interested in a few people’s lives, and not in pondering how their own life will ameliorate.
Some people would argue that this status quo has been challenged by the unprecedented popularity of the new talk show “Satyamev Jayate”… But, to my mind, it only corroborates the fact that masses are so uninformed about what’s going on in their country. If you did not know about the wide spread problems of female feticide, child sexual abuse, or malpractices in healthcare, I wonder if you can be considered educated at-all!!! Do we really need Aamir to sensitize us? Can’t we be self-aware and fine-tune our actions in the direction of solutions???

Just in case if you are still in denial of Indian media's flaws, here's Mr Umesh Aggarwal’s documentary, “Brokering News”, released by the Public Service Broadcasting Trust (PSBT) that exposes the depth of corruption in the mainstream media. It shows corruption in the political coverage of elections, news on business and industry and even movie reviews.



   Directed by Umesh Aggarwal
  Assistant Director & Editor – Naveen Samhotra
  Script – Anirban Bhattacharya
  Narration – Roshan Set