India is one of the leaders of the developing world today. In
the times of global slowdown, the Indian economy is likely to grow by close
to 6% in the year 2013-14. However, if
India wants to grow rich and get into the league of the developed nations, it
has to strengthen the pillars of scientific research. To understand this let’s
take an example of I-Pod, a product developed by an American company, Apple. China,
the manufacturer country of the I-Pod, gets only about $4 out of the sales
price of $299. Most of the amount goes to various component suppliers and the
product developers in USA.
It is clear – the country that holds patent-rights and develops
global brands benefits the most. If India wants to become a developed
nation, if it wants to compete with China and the United States, it has to
develop global brands. And the first step in this direction is scientific
research.
The development in the field of science and research is rooted
in university-level pure science courses (i.e., Physics, Mathematics, Chemistry
and Biology). Unfortunately, the educational practices in an average Indian
university can be described as follows:
·
This is the syllabus, and these
many theories are to be memorized. Refer the test papers of last five years to
get an idea of possible question-items.
·
Reading material can be
obtained from the seniors (however, some ‘helpful’ faculty members would
dictate notes to the students in classrooms).
·
Drill and practice are the
keys for success, so practice writing theories ones, twice, thrice and so on.
Once you are able to reproduce theories as in the “reading material”, your
first-class is confirmed, possibly with a gold medal.
·
If you perform below
expectations, consider that you failed to put sufficient laborious efforts, or
wrongly played “the option” card. [Note: University examinations often give
optional questions with instructions such as – “Answer any 3 out of 5
questions”. So, it is possible that a student has not studied the entire
syllabus and still gets high score. Students often strategize what not to study
and leave out subject-content in “option”.]
This method may efficiently produce trainers (who identify
themselves as “teachers”), who can pass on their memorization techniques to the
younger generation, but how can it produce scientists and researchers? [The
reason of a few exceptions that can be seen in the society can be either
student’s strong intrinsic motivation for learning or a presence of a dedicated
faculty member]. Given this absence of research culture, it is not-at-all
surprising that the Indian universities hardly ever appear in the list of top
500 universities of the world. As a
consequence of such educational practice, India has not yet participated in the
global competition in the field of science and research.
According to the Science
Report 2010 of UNESCO, India’s contribution to
the world research publication is only 3.7%, whereas China’s contribution is
10.6% and the United States’ contribution is whooping 27.7%. In the category of
global patents, India’s share is merely 0.5% (USPTO patents) and 0.2% (Triadic
patents), whereas China’s share is 4.7% (USPTO) and 0.5% (Triadic) and the US’
share is massive 52.2% (USPTO) and 41.8% (Triadic). Though India has almost
doubled its research publications between 2002 and 2008, this progress is
overshadowed by glittering Chinese advancement.
Table 1: Scientific
Publications in India and China.
|
Year 2002
|
Year 2008
|
India
|
18,911
|
36,261
|
China
|
38,206
|
1,04,968
|
Resource:
UNESCO Science Report (2010)
Almost 16% of the world’s population resides in India. However,
only 2.2% of scientific researchers of the world hold Indian citizenship. In
addition, for every one million of population, India has only 137 scientific
researchers; this is outnumbered by many times by all of the developed
countries and many of the developing nations (for e.g., China -1070, US -4663
and Japan 5573).
Indian policymakers ought to finalize the aims of science
education at the university level. If Indian students are expected to get
absorbed into the research centres on completion of their graduate studies and
to add value to research projects, then they must have had enough opportunities
to develop required knowledge and skills during their course work at the
universities. The graduate studies must nurture the thinking and working
pattern of scientists in students.
Usually, a researcher follows the following steps:
1. Identify and define a problem
2. Literature review
3. Form hypothesis
4. Develop methods, conduct experiment and collect data
5. Analyze data and produce results
6. Explain results and draw conclusions
7. Provide directions for further research
Now if a graduate
programme requires students to reproduce already obtained solutions of given
problems and theories, how will a student come up with newer research problems?
And without training, what literature review will s/he pursue and what sort of
hypothesis will s/he develop? Of course, in such a scenario, the expectation of
methodology development is out of question. This is a grim picture of the pure
science programme pass-outs. These graduate programmes are not aligned with
their professional-aims.
According to the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER,
2005), out of total unemployed graduates, 22.3% are pure science graduates. The
proportion of pure science pass outs is 62.8% among total unemployed post
graduates. This may be a major reason why students avoid pure science
programmes after completion of their high school studies (as suggested by NCAER,
2005). As per UNESCO’s Science Report 2010, one of the biggest challenges for
India in the coming years will be to revolutionarily improve both quantity and
quality of scientists and researchers. This gigantic task cannot be done
without structural reforms in university education. In order to directly link
pure science departments with research work, I present certain suggestions
based on my observations of research universities in the USA.
·
Every university should
have at least one world class library with a strong e-database of e-books and
articles of national and international research journals. All of the students
and faculty members should have access to this database through internet (e-network),
irrespective of their physical location. E-copies of all of the master’s and
doctoral theses/dissertations should be included in this database. In addition,
various universities can be networked throughout India. Throughout the country,
such e-network will facilitate a free flow of knowledge, which is a
precondition for research.
·
All of the research
centres can be linked with this e-network. And experimental data/results and
research articles/reports can be made available to each and every university
student and faculty member.
·
At the post graduate level
a student must be educated for the following:
o
Critical analyses of
research articles
o
Identifying and defining
research problems and developing hypotheses
o
Understanding technical
limitations
o
Preparing research and
grant proposals
o
Working closely with faculty
members on research projects and writing thesis
o
Publishing research academic
articles/papers/thesis
In addition to the written examination, the above points should
have significant weightage, while assessing a student’s academic abilities.
·
India has multiple
organizations/interest groups/associations corresponding to various fields of
inquiry. It is better to combine various associations and to have one national
association/organization/group for each subject of pure science (i.e., one
group for math, physics, chemistry, biology each). Universities should
encourage students to become members of such national associations, so that
they can network with various national/ international scholars as well as other
students from different universities.
Providing incentives for Knowledge-production: India’s research sector is primarily driven by the government run institutions. A very few research centres and elite educational institutions care for contribution of its faculty members to the scientific publications. The promotion of faculty members is often solely dependent on the personal relationships and seniority in most of the Indian universities. The tenure-track system which is based on publication of peer-reviewed papers, citations, academic presentations and teaching quality is non-existent at-large in universities. As a result, the faculty members do not have much of external motivation for contributing to their respective fields of inquiry.
Furthermore, the leadership structure of the universities is ill-fitted for the pursuit of excellence and knowledge production. While talking on the higher education systems around the world, Prof. Stephen Heyneman made an excellent point explaining the difference between top ranking American universities and the universities in developing nations. The leadership structure in top ranking American university is very conducive for continuous pursuit of excellence. The board of visitors (mainly, donors and alumni) appoint the president of the university on contract-bases and pay them hundreds of thousands of dollars. In order to get that job, the highly-skilled candidates have to present institutional goals and action plans for the same – how the institution will achieve and maintain excellence, how will the resources be generated and how all stake-holders will be taken on board etc. Therefore, from the day one, the president has a mission and s/he is highly accountable. On the other hand, the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in most of the Indian universities is based on political loyalties and personal influences. There is no vision presented for the institutional growth; and there is hardly any accountability. As long as the system runs without much media outrage (possibly on corruption, lack of governance, or more serious criminal charges) and the political equations are in balance, the vice-chancellor can survive.
In total, neither the institution leaders nor the faculty members face any negative consequences for not contributing to the knowledge production.
·
All of the universities
must strive to minimize the distance between their pure science departments and
research centres/laboratories. In addition, like the students of business and
engineering programmes, the pure science students should be interviewed
on-campus by public/private research labs/centres. The universities should also
approach to the companies for hiring pure science graduates.
Coming
back to the bigger picture, all eminent economists and financial experts the
world-over seem to be agreeing on one particular point – a country with
knowledge-based economy will take global leadership in the coming times. The
heart of “Knowledge Economy” is progress in science and research. The USA, EU,
and East Asia are far ahead and still firmly marching forward in that
direction. Will India participate in the global competition and be a serious
contender?
References
Gupta, D., & Gupta, N. (2012). Higher Education in India:
Structure, Statistics and Challenges. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(2),
17-24.
